Measles, COVID, and the Deadly Pattern Hospitals Won’t Talk About

A child dies of measles. The media blames the virus. "Get vaccinated."
A COVID patient dies. The media blames the virus. "Get vaccinated."

But what if the real cause wasn’t the virus at all? What if hospitals withheld simple, proven treatments—just like they did with COVID?

This pattern isn’t random. And it’s not new.

No Vitamin A for measles.

No early treatments for COVID.

Denied water, sedated, ventilated.

Family removed. Patient dies.

Who benefits?

There are undeniable parallels between how measles and COVID cases have been handled in hospitals, particularly in cases where early, well-documented interventions were either ignored or actively discouraged. The pattern suggests several potential motives or systemic factors at play:

1. Protocol Over Patient-Centered Care – During COVID, hospitals followed rigid treatment protocols that excluded early interventions like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or even simple immune-supportive measures like vitamin D or zinc. Similarly, measles patients are often not given Vitamin A or anti-inflammatory treatments like budesonide, despite strong evidence supporting their use. Hospitals and doctors may fear deviating from "standard of care" guidelines due to liability concerns, pressure from regulatory agencies, or the threat of losing medical licenses.
2. Pharmaceutical Industry Influence – There is a strong financial incentive to push vaccination as the ultimate preventive solution rather than early treatment. If measles deaths are perceived as inevitable without the MMR vaccine, it reinforces the necessity of mass vaccination programs. Similarly, during COVID, hospitals received substantial financial incentives for ventilator use and COVID-coded deaths. Denying early treatment and moving patients through a predictable decline could reinforce the narrative of vaccine necessity.
3. Media Fear Campaigns & Public Perception Management – Both COVID and measles have been used as fear-driven narratives to promote compliance with public health policies. The media rarely investigates whether alternative treatments could have saved lives. Instead, they emphasize death rates and amplify the "get vaccinated" message, further conditioning the public to trust in vaccines rather than in individual immune resilience or early treatment.
4. Control Over Family & Medical Decisions – The exclusion of family members from ICUs (as seen in both COVID and now measles cases) prevents outside accountability. Families who might advocate for alternative treatments are systematically removed, leaving patients fully at the mercy of institutional protocols. Without loved ones to intervene, hospitals can follow their standardized treatment paths without pushback.
5. Legal & Regulatory Capture – Hospitals operate within legal frameworks that are heavily influenced by government agencies like the CDC, WHO, and pharmaceutical-backed institutions. This creates an environment where medical autonomy is discouraged, and doctors who attempt early, out-of-protocol treatments are threatened with consequences. In both COVID and measles cases, doctors who prescribed treatments outside the accepted guidelines (e.g., ivermectin for COVID or Vitamin A/Budesonide for measles) have faced professional discipline.
6. Data Manipulation for Policy Justification – By allowing measles cases to progress without treatment, hospitals can generate alarming statistics that justify stricter vaccine mandates. This is eerily similar to how COVID death counts were manipulated, with many deaths attributed to COVID rather than the actual causes (e.g., ventilator mismanagement, secondary infections, or untreated inflammation). By engineering an artificially high fatality rate, public health officials can push for policy changes, such as stricter school vaccine requirements or elimination of exemptions.

The Bigger Picture

If hospitals systematically deny simple, life-saving treatments for diseases like measles and COVID, the public should be asking why. Is it incompetence? Fear of liability? Or a deliberate strategy to increase vaccine uptake by making the disease appear more dangerous than it actually is?

It is essential to keep pressing for transparency, demand medical freedom, and educate the public on the full range of treatment options—before, during, and after infection. Every individual deserves informed consent and access to the best available care, not just what aligns with pharmaceutical and institutional agendas.

The Parents Speak: What Really Happened to Their Child